On Avoiding the Union Bound When Answering Multiple Differentially Private Queries

Badih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi
Proceedings of Thirty Fourth Conference on Learning Theory, PMLR 134:2133-2146, 2021.

Abstract

In this work, we study the problem of answering k queries with (ϵ,δ)-differential privacy, where each query has sensitivity one. We give an algorithm for this task that achieves an expected error bound of O(1ϵklog1δ), which is known to be tight (Steinke and Ullman, 2016). A very recent work by Dagan and Kur (2020) provides a similar result, albeit via a completely different approach. One difference between our work and theirs is that our guarantee holds even when δ<2Ω(k/(logk)8) whereas theirs does not apply in this case. On the other hand, the algorithm of Dagan and Kur (2020) has a remarkable advantage that the error bound of O(1ϵklog1δ) holds not only in expectation but always (i.e., with probability one) while we can only get a high probability (or expected) guarantee on the error.

Cite this Paper


BibTeX
@InProceedings{pmlr-v134-ghazi21a, title = {On Avoiding the Union Bound When Answering Multiple Differentially Private Queries}, author = {Ghazi, Badih and Kumar, Ravi and Manurangsi, Pasin}, booktitle = {Proceedings of Thirty Fourth Conference on Learning Theory}, pages = {2133--2146}, year = {2021}, editor = {Belkin, Mikhail and Kpotufe, Samory}, volume = {134}, series = {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, month = {15--19 Aug}, publisher = {PMLR}, pdf = {http://proceedings.mlr.press/v134/ghazi21a/ghazi21a.pdf}, url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v134/ghazi21a.html}, abstract = {In this work, we study the problem of answering $k$ queries with $(\epsilon, \delta)$-differential privacy, where each query has sensitivity one. We give an algorithm for this task that achieves an expected $\ell_\infty$ error bound of $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon}\sqrt{k \log \frac{1}{\delta}})$, which is known to be tight (Steinke and Ullman, 2016). A very recent work by Dagan and Kur (2020) provides a similar result, albeit via a completely different approach. One difference between our work and theirs is that our guarantee holds even when $\delta < 2^{-\Omega(k/(\log k)^8)}$ whereas theirs does not apply in this case. On the other hand, the algorithm of Dagan and Kur (2020) has a remarkable advantage that the $\ell_{\infty}$ error bound of $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon}\sqrt{k \log \frac{1}{\delta}})$ holds not only in expectation but always (i.e., with probability one) while we can only get a high probability (or expected) guarantee on the error.} }
Endnote
%0 Conference Paper %T On Avoiding the Union Bound When Answering Multiple Differentially Private Queries %A Badih Ghazi %A Ravi Kumar %A Pasin Manurangsi %B Proceedings of Thirty Fourth Conference on Learning Theory %C Proceedings of Machine Learning Research %D 2021 %E Mikhail Belkin %E Samory Kpotufe %F pmlr-v134-ghazi21a %I PMLR %P 2133--2146 %U https://proceedings.mlr.press/v134/ghazi21a.html %V 134 %X In this work, we study the problem of answering $k$ queries with $(\epsilon, \delta)$-differential privacy, where each query has sensitivity one. We give an algorithm for this task that achieves an expected $\ell_\infty$ error bound of $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon}\sqrt{k \log \frac{1}{\delta}})$, which is known to be tight (Steinke and Ullman, 2016). A very recent work by Dagan and Kur (2020) provides a similar result, albeit via a completely different approach. One difference between our work and theirs is that our guarantee holds even when $\delta < 2^{-\Omega(k/(\log k)^8)}$ whereas theirs does not apply in this case. On the other hand, the algorithm of Dagan and Kur (2020) has a remarkable advantage that the $\ell_{\infty}$ error bound of $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon}\sqrt{k \log \frac{1}{\delta}})$ holds not only in expectation but always (i.e., with probability one) while we can only get a high probability (or expected) guarantee on the error.
APA
Ghazi, B., Kumar, R. & Manurangsi, P.. (2021). On Avoiding the Union Bound When Answering Multiple Differentially Private Queries. Proceedings of Thirty Fourth Conference on Learning Theory, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 134:2133-2146 Available from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v134/ghazi21a.html.

Related Material