Analysis of the Optimization Landscape of Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) Control

Yujie Tang, Yang Zheng, Na Li
Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Learning for Dynamics and Control, PMLR 144:599-610, 2021.

Abstract

This paper revisits the classical Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control from a modern optimization perspective. We analyze two aspects of the optimization landscape of the LQG problem: 1) connectivity of the set of stabilizing controllers $\mathcal{C}_n$; and 2) structure of stationary points. It is known that similarity transformations do not change the input-output behavior of a dynamical controller or LQG cost. This inherent symmetry by similarity transformations makes the landscape of LQG very rich. We show that 1) the set of stabilizing controllers $\mathcal{C}_n$ has at most two path-connected components and they are diffeomorphic under a mapping defined by a similarity transformation; 2) there might exist many \emph{strictly suboptimal stationary points} of the LQG cost function over $\mathcal{C}_n$ and these stationary points are always \emph{non-minimal}; 3) all \emph{minimal} stationary points are globally optimal and they are identical up to a similarity transformation. These results shed some light on the performance analysis of direct policy gradient methods for solving the LQG problem.

Cite this Paper

BibTeX
@InProceedings{pmlr-v144-tang21a, title = {Analysis of the Optimization Landscape of Linear Quadratic Gaussian ({LQG}) Control}, author = {Tang, Yujie and Zheng, Yang and Li, Na}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Learning for Dynamics and Control}, pages = {599--610}, year = {2021}, editor = {Jadbabaie, Ali and Lygeros, John and Pappas, George J. and A. Parrilo, Pablo and Recht, Benjamin and Tomlin, Claire J. and Zeilinger, Melanie N.}, volume = {144}, series = {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, month = {07 -- 08 June}, publisher = {PMLR}, pdf = {http://proceedings.mlr.press/v144/tang21a/tang21a.pdf}, url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v144/tang21a.html}, abstract = {This paper revisits the classical Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control from a modern optimization perspective. We analyze two aspects of the optimization landscape of the LQG problem: 1) connectivity of the set of stabilizing controllers $\mathcal{C}_n$; and 2) structure of stationary points. It is known that similarity transformations do not change the input-output behavior of a dynamical controller or LQG cost. This inherent symmetry by similarity transformations makes the landscape of LQG very rich. We show that 1) the set of stabilizing controllers $\mathcal{C}_n$ has at most two path-connected components and they are diffeomorphic under a mapping defined by a similarity transformation; 2) there might exist many \emph{strictly suboptimal stationary points} of the LQG cost function over $\mathcal{C}_n$ and these stationary points are always \emph{non-minimal}; 3) all \emph{minimal} stationary points are globally optimal and they are identical up to a similarity transformation. These results shed some light on the performance analysis of direct policy gradient methods for solving the LQG problem.} }
Endnote
%0 Conference Paper %T Analysis of the Optimization Landscape of Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) Control %A Yujie Tang %A Yang Zheng %A Na Li %B Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Learning for Dynamics and Control %C Proceedings of Machine Learning Research %D 2021 %E Ali Jadbabaie %E John Lygeros %E George J. Pappas %E Pablo A. Parrilo %E Benjamin Recht %E Claire J. Tomlin %E Melanie N. Zeilinger %F pmlr-v144-tang21a %I PMLR %P 599--610 %U https://proceedings.mlr.press/v144/tang21a.html %V 144 %X This paper revisits the classical Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control from a modern optimization perspective. We analyze two aspects of the optimization landscape of the LQG problem: 1) connectivity of the set of stabilizing controllers $\mathcal{C}_n$; and 2) structure of stationary points. It is known that similarity transformations do not change the input-output behavior of a dynamical controller or LQG cost. This inherent symmetry by similarity transformations makes the landscape of LQG very rich. We show that 1) the set of stabilizing controllers $\mathcal{C}_n$ has at most two path-connected components and they are diffeomorphic under a mapping defined by a similarity transformation; 2) there might exist many \emph{strictly suboptimal stationary points} of the LQG cost function over $\mathcal{C}_n$ and these stationary points are always \emph{non-minimal}; 3) all \emph{minimal} stationary points are globally optimal and they are identical up to a similarity transformation. These results shed some light on the performance analysis of direct policy gradient methods for solving the LQG problem.
APA
Tang, Y., Zheng, Y. & Li, N.. (2021). Analysis of the Optimization Landscape of Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) Control. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Learning for Dynamics and Control, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 144:599-610 Available from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v144/tang21a.html.

Related Material