[edit]

# Counting Motifs with Graph Sampling

*Proceedings of the 31st Conference On Learning Theory*, PMLR 75:1966-2011, 2018.

#### Abstract

Applied researchers often construct a network from data that has been collected from a random sample of nodes, with the goal to infer properties of the parent network from the sampled version. Two of the most widely used sampling schemes are

*subgraph sampling*, where we sample each vertex independently with probability $p$ and observe the subgraph induced by the sampled vertices, and*neighborhood sampling*, where we additionally observe the edges between the sampled vertices and their neighbors. In this paper, we study the problem of estimating the number of motifs as induced subgraphs under both models from a statistical perspective. We show that: for parent graph $G$ with maximal degree $d$, for any connected motif $h$ on $k$ vertices, to estimate the number of copies of $h$ in $G$, denoted by $s=\mathsf{s}(h,G)$, with a multiplicative error of $\epsilon$,- For subgraph sampling, the optimal sampling ratio $p$ is $\Theta_{k}(\max\{ (s\epsilon^2)^{-\frac{1}{k}}, \; \frac{d^{k-1}}{s\epsilon^{2}} \})$, which only depends on the size of the motif but
*not*its actual topology. Furthermore, we show that Horvitz-Thompson type estimators are universally optimal for any connected motifs. - For neighborhood sampling, we propose a family of estimators, encompassing and outperforming the Horvitz-Thompson estimator and achieving the sampling ratio $O_{k}(\min\{ (\frac{d}{s\epsilon^2})^{\frac{1}{k-1}}, \; \sqrt{\frac{d^{k-2}}{s\epsilon^2}}\})$, which again only depends on the size of $h$. This is shown to be optimal for all motifs with at most $4$ vertices and cliques of all sizes.