The Role of Randomness in Stability

Stability is a central property in learning and statistics promising the output of an algorithm $\mathcal{A}$ does not change substantially when applied to similar datasets $S$ and $S’$. It is an elementary fact that any sufficiently stable algorithm (e.g. one returning the same result with high probability, satisfying privacy guarantees, etc.) must be randomized. This raises a natural question: can we quantify how much randomness is needed for algorithmic stability? We study the randomness complexity of two influential notions of stability in learning: replicability (which promises $\mathcal{A}$ usually outputs the same result when run over samples from the same distribution), and differential privacy (which promises the output distribution of $\mathcal{A}$ remains similar under neighboring datasets). In particular, building on the ideas of (Dixon, Pavan, Vander Woude, and Vinodchandran ICML 2024) and (Cannone, Su, and Vadhan ITCS 2024), we prove a "weak-to-strong" boosting theorem for stability in these settings: the randomness complexity of a task $\mathcal{M}$ is tightly controlled by the best replication probability of any deterministic algorithm solving $\mathcal{M}$, a parameter known as $\mathcal{M}$’s "global stability" (Chase, Moran, Yehudayoff FOCS 2023). Finally, we use this connection to characterize the randomness complexity of PAC Learning: a class has bounded randomness complexity iff it has finite Littlestone dimension, and moreover scales at worst logarithmically in the excess error of the learner. As a corollary, we resolve a question of (Chase, Chornomaz, Moran, and Yehudayoff STOC 2024) about the error-dependent list-replicability of agnostic learning.