Reflecting on the State of Rehearsal-Free Continual Learning with Pretrained Models

Lukas Thede, Karsten Roth, Olivier J Henaff, Matthias Bethge, Zeynep Akata
Proceedings of The 3rd Conference on Lifelong Learning Agents, PMLR 274:1076-1093, 2025.

Abstract

With the advent and recent ubiquity of foundation models, continual learning (CL) has recently shifted from continual training from scratch to the continual adaptation of pretrained models, seeing particular success on rehearsal-free CL benchmarks (RFCL). To achieve this, most proposed methods adapt and restructure parameter-efficient finetuning techniques (PEFT) to suit the continual nature of the problem. Based most often on input-conditional query-mechanisms or regularizations on top of prompt- or adapter-based PEFT, these PEFT-style RFCL (P-RFCL) approaches report peak performances; often convincingly outperforming existing CL techniques. However, on the other end, critical studies have recently highlighted competitive results by training on just the first task or via simple non-parametric baselines. Consequently, questions arise about the relationship between methodological choices in P-RFCL and their reported high benchmark scores. In this work, we tackle these questions to better understand the true drivers behind strong P-RFCL performances, their placement w.r.t. recent first-task adaptation studies, and their relation to preceding CL standards such as EWC or SI. In particular, we show: (1) P-RFCL techniques relying on input-conditional query mechanisms work not because, but rather despite them by collapsing towards standard PEFT shortcut solutions. (2) Indeed, we show how most often, P-RFCL techniques can be matched by a simple and lightweight PEFT baseline. (3) Using this baseline, we identify the implicit bound on tunable parameters when deriving RFCL approaches from PEFT methods as a potential denominator behind P-RFCL efficacy. Finally, we (4) better disentangle continual versus first-task adaptation, and (5) motivate standard RFCL techniques s.a. EWC or SI in light of recent P-RFCL methods. Together, we believe our insights to contribute to a more grounded treatment of CL with pretrained models.

Cite this Paper

BibTeX
@InProceedings{pmlr-v274-thede25a, title = {Reflecting on the State of Rehearsal-Free Continual Learning with Pretrained Models}, author = {Thede, Lukas and Roth, Karsten and Henaff, Olivier J and Bethge, Matthias and Akata, Zeynep}, booktitle = {Proceedings of The 3rd Conference on Lifelong Learning Agents}, pages = {1076--1093}, year = {2025}, editor = {Lomonaco, Vincenzo and Melacci, Stefano and Tuytelaars, Tinne and Chandar, Sarath and Pascanu, Razvan}, volume = {274}, series = {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, month = {29 Jul--01 Aug}, publisher = {PMLR}, pdf = {https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mlresearch/v274/main/assets/thede25a/thede25a.pdf}, url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v274/thede25a.html}, abstract = {With the advent and recent ubiquity of foundation models, continual learning (CL) has recently shifted from continual training from scratch to the continual adaptation of pretrained models, seeing particular success on rehearsal-free CL benchmarks (RFCL). To achieve this, most proposed methods adapt and restructure parameter-efficient finetuning techniques (PEFT) to suit the continual nature of the problem. Based most often on input-conditional query-mechanisms or regularizations on top of prompt- or adapter-based PEFT, these PEFT-style RFCL (P-RFCL) approaches report peak performances; often convincingly outperforming existing CL techniques. However, on the other end, critical studies have recently highlighted competitive results by training on just the first task or via simple non-parametric baselines. Consequently, questions arise about the relationship between methodological choices in P-RFCL and their reported high benchmark scores. In this work, we tackle these questions to better understand the true drivers behind strong P-RFCL performances, their placement w.r.t. recent first-task adaptation studies, and their relation to preceding CL standards such as EWC or SI. In particular, we show: (1) P-RFCL techniques relying on input-conditional query mechanisms work not because, but rather despite them by collapsing towards standard PEFT shortcut solutions. (2) Indeed, we show how most often, P-RFCL techniques can be matched by a simple and lightweight PEFT baseline. (3) Using this baseline, we identify the implicit bound on tunable parameters when deriving RFCL approaches from PEFT methods as a potential denominator behind P-RFCL efficacy. Finally, we (4) better disentangle continual versus first-task adaptation, and (5) motivate standard RFCL techniques s.a. EWC or SI in light of recent P-RFCL methods. Together, we believe our insights to contribute to a more grounded treatment of CL with pretrained models.} }
Endnote
%0 Conference Paper %T Reflecting on the State of Rehearsal-Free Continual Learning with Pretrained Models %A Lukas Thede %A Karsten Roth %A Olivier J Henaff %A Matthias Bethge %A Zeynep Akata %B Proceedings of The 3rd Conference on Lifelong Learning Agents %C Proceedings of Machine Learning Research %D 2025 %E Vincenzo Lomonaco %E Stefano Melacci %E Tinne Tuytelaars %E Sarath Chandar %E Razvan Pascanu %F pmlr-v274-thede25a %I PMLR %P 1076--1093 %U https://proceedings.mlr.press/v274/thede25a.html %V 274 %X With the advent and recent ubiquity of foundation models, continual learning (CL) has recently shifted from continual training from scratch to the continual adaptation of pretrained models, seeing particular success on rehearsal-free CL benchmarks (RFCL). To achieve this, most proposed methods adapt and restructure parameter-efficient finetuning techniques (PEFT) to suit the continual nature of the problem. Based most often on input-conditional query-mechanisms or regularizations on top of prompt- or adapter-based PEFT, these PEFT-style RFCL (P-RFCL) approaches report peak performances; often convincingly outperforming existing CL techniques. However, on the other end, critical studies have recently highlighted competitive results by training on just the first task or via simple non-parametric baselines. Consequently, questions arise about the relationship between methodological choices in P-RFCL and their reported high benchmark scores. In this work, we tackle these questions to better understand the true drivers behind strong P-RFCL performances, their placement w.r.t. recent first-task adaptation studies, and their relation to preceding CL standards such as EWC or SI. In particular, we show: (1) P-RFCL techniques relying on input-conditional query mechanisms work not because, but rather despite them by collapsing towards standard PEFT shortcut solutions. (2) Indeed, we show how most often, P-RFCL techniques can be matched by a simple and lightweight PEFT baseline. (3) Using this baseline, we identify the implicit bound on tunable parameters when deriving RFCL approaches from PEFT methods as a potential denominator behind P-RFCL efficacy. Finally, we (4) better disentangle continual versus first-task adaptation, and (5) motivate standard RFCL techniques s.a. EWC or SI in light of recent P-RFCL methods. Together, we believe our insights to contribute to a more grounded treatment of CL with pretrained models.
APA
Thede, L., Roth, K., Henaff, O.J., Bethge, M. & Akata, Z.. (2025). Reflecting on the State of Rehearsal-Free Continual Learning with Pretrained Models. Proceedings of The 3rd Conference on Lifelong Learning Agents, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 274:1076-1093 Available from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v274/thede25a.html.

Related Material