Pareto-Guided Optimal Transport for Multi-Reward Alignment

Ying Ba, Tianyu Zhang, Mohan Zhou, Yalong Bai, Wenyi Mo, Guiwei Zhang, Bing Su, Ji-Rong Wen
Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR 306:4671-4693, 2026.

Abstract

Text-to-image generation models have achieved remarkable progress in preference optimization, yet achieving robust alignment across diverse reward models remains a significant challenge. Existing multi-reward fusion approaches rely on weighted summation, which is costly to tune and insufficient for balancing conflicting objectives. More critically, optimization with reward models is highly susceptible to reward hacking, where reward scores increase while the perceived quality of generated images deteriorates. We demonstrate that optimizing against a unified global target under heterogeneous reward upper bounds can induce reward hacking, a risk further exacerbated by the inherent instability of weak reward models. To mitigate this, we propose a Pareto Frontier-Guided Optimal Transport (PG-OT) framework. Our method constructs a prompt-specific Pareto frontier and maps dominated samples toward it via distribution-aware optimal transport. Furthermore, we develop both online and offline optimization strategies tailored to diverse reward signal characteristics. To provide a more rigorous assessment, we introduce the Joint Domination Rate (JDR) and Joint Collapse Rate (JCR) as principled metrics to quantify multi-reward synergy and reward hacking. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms strong baselines with an 11% gain in JDR and achieves a near 80% win rate in human evaluations.

Cite this Paper


BibTeX
@InProceedings{pmlr-v306-ba26a, title = {Pareto-Guided Optimal Transport for Multi-Reward Alignment}, author = {Ba, Ying and Zhang, Tianyu and Zhou, Mohan and Bai, Yalong and Mo, Wenyi and Zhang, Guiwei and Su, Bing and Wen, Ji-Rong}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning}, pages = {4671--4693}, year = {2026}, editor = {Zhang, Tong and Dudik, Miroslav and Jaggi, Martin and Agarwal, Alekh and Li, Sharon and Schuurmans, Dale and Zhu, Jerry and Berkenkamp, Felix and Dong, Hanze and Bietti, Alberto}, volume = {306}, series = {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, month = {06--11 Jul}, publisher = {PMLR}, pdf = {https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mlresearch/v306/main/assets/ba26a/ba26a.pdf}, url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v306/ba26a.html}, abstract = {Text-to-image generation models have achieved remarkable progress in preference optimization, yet achieving robust alignment across diverse reward models remains a significant challenge. Existing multi-reward fusion approaches rely on weighted summation, which is costly to tune and insufficient for balancing conflicting objectives. More critically, optimization with reward models is highly susceptible to reward hacking, where reward scores increase while the perceived quality of generated images deteriorates. We demonstrate that optimizing against a unified global target under heterogeneous reward upper bounds can induce reward hacking, a risk further exacerbated by the inherent instability of weak reward models. To mitigate this, we propose a Pareto Frontier-Guided Optimal Transport (PG-OT) framework. Our method constructs a prompt-specific Pareto frontier and maps dominated samples toward it via distribution-aware optimal transport. Furthermore, we develop both online and offline optimization strategies tailored to diverse reward signal characteristics. To provide a more rigorous assessment, we introduce the Joint Domination Rate (JDR) and Joint Collapse Rate (JCR) as principled metrics to quantify multi-reward synergy and reward hacking. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms strong baselines with an 11% gain in JDR and achieves a near 80% win rate in human evaluations.} }
Endnote
%0 Conference Paper %T Pareto-Guided Optimal Transport for Multi-Reward Alignment %A Ying Ba %A Tianyu Zhang %A Mohan Zhou %A Yalong Bai %A Wenyi Mo %A Guiwei Zhang %A Bing Su %A Ji-Rong Wen %B Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning %C Proceedings of Machine Learning Research %D 2026 %E Tong Zhang %E Miroslav Dudik %E Martin Jaggi %E Alekh Agarwal %E Sharon Li %E Dale Schuurmans %E Jerry Zhu %E Felix Berkenkamp %E Hanze Dong %E Alberto Bietti %F pmlr-v306-ba26a %I PMLR %P 4671--4693 %U https://proceedings.mlr.press/v306/ba26a.html %V 306 %X Text-to-image generation models have achieved remarkable progress in preference optimization, yet achieving robust alignment across diverse reward models remains a significant challenge. Existing multi-reward fusion approaches rely on weighted summation, which is costly to tune and insufficient for balancing conflicting objectives. More critically, optimization with reward models is highly susceptible to reward hacking, where reward scores increase while the perceived quality of generated images deteriorates. We demonstrate that optimizing against a unified global target under heterogeneous reward upper bounds can induce reward hacking, a risk further exacerbated by the inherent instability of weak reward models. To mitigate this, we propose a Pareto Frontier-Guided Optimal Transport (PG-OT) framework. Our method constructs a prompt-specific Pareto frontier and maps dominated samples toward it via distribution-aware optimal transport. Furthermore, we develop both online and offline optimization strategies tailored to diverse reward signal characteristics. To provide a more rigorous assessment, we introduce the Joint Domination Rate (JDR) and Joint Collapse Rate (JCR) as principled metrics to quantify multi-reward synergy and reward hacking. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms strong baselines with an 11% gain in JDR and achieves a near 80% win rate in human evaluations.
APA
Ba, Y., Zhang, T., Zhou, M., Bai, Y., Mo, W., Zhang, G., Su, B. & Wen, J.. (2026). Pareto-Guided Optimal Transport for Multi-Reward Alignment. Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 306:4671-4693 Available from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v306/ba26a.html.

Related Material