Rapid Poison: Practical Poisoning Attacks Against the Rapid Response Framework

David Huang, Jaewon Chang, Avidan Shah, Prateek Mittal, Chawin Sitawarin
Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR 306:46457-46487, 2026.

Abstract

The Rapid Response (RR) framework (Peng et al., 2024), deployed in production systems including Anthropic’s ASL-3 safeguards (Anthropic, 2025), dynamically adapts jailbreak detection classifiers by generating synthetic training data from emerging attacks. We reveal that prompt injection can infiltrate this pipeline to deliver poisoned samples into the classifier’s training set, enabling two attack objectives: (I) targeted poisoning attacks that create false positives on harmless samples by categorizing them as a jailbreak, with a specific desired feature (e.g., certain formatting, subject, or keyword), (II) concept-based backdoor attacks that induce false negatives on jailbreak inputs, generalizing even to jailbreaks from attack strategies the defender explicitly trained against, when the backdoor trigger is present. Importantly, our threat model restricts adversaries to modify- ing only jailbreak samples (not benign data or labels), a constraint unexplored by prior work that makes the second objective particularly challeng- ing. We address this with Omission Attack, which exploits a new phenomenon: when training on concept-absent unsafe samples, the classifier mis- associates that concept’s presence with the safe label. Both attacks flip nearly all target labels with only 1% poisoning rate. Code: https://github.com/DH-davidhuang/rapid-poison

Cite this Paper


BibTeX
@InProceedings{pmlr-v306-huang26e, title = {Rapid Poison: Practical Poisoning Attacks Against the Rapid Response Framework}, author = {Huang, David and Chang, Jaewon and Shah, Avidan and Mittal, Prateek and Sitawarin, Chawin}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning}, pages = {46457--46487}, year = {2026}, editor = {Zhang, Tong and Dudik, Miroslav and Jaggi, Martin and Agarwal, Alekh and Li, Sharon and Schuurmans, Dale and Zhu, Jerry and Berkenkamp, Felix and Dong, Hanze and Bietti, Alberto}, volume = {306}, series = {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, month = {06--11 Jul}, publisher = {PMLR}, pdf = {https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mlresearch/v306/main/assets/huang26e/huang26e.pdf}, url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v306/huang26e.html}, abstract = {The Rapid Response (RR) framework (Peng et al., 2024), deployed in production systems including Anthropic’s ASL-3 safeguards (Anthropic, 2025), dynamically adapts jailbreak detection classifiers by generating synthetic training data from emerging attacks. We reveal that prompt injection can infiltrate this pipeline to deliver poisoned samples into the classifier’s training set, enabling two attack objectives: (I) targeted poisoning attacks that create false positives on harmless samples by categorizing them as a jailbreak, with a specific desired feature (e.g., certain formatting, subject, or keyword), (II) concept-based backdoor attacks that induce false negatives on jailbreak inputs, generalizing even to jailbreaks from attack strategies the defender explicitly trained against, when the backdoor trigger is present. Importantly, our threat model restricts adversaries to modify- ing only jailbreak samples (not benign data or labels), a constraint unexplored by prior work that makes the second objective particularly challeng- ing. We address this with Omission Attack, which exploits a new phenomenon: when training on concept-absent unsafe samples, the classifier mis- associates that concept’s presence with the safe label. Both attacks flip nearly all target labels with only 1% poisoning rate. Code: https://github.com/DH-davidhuang/rapid-poison} }
Endnote
%0 Conference Paper %T Rapid Poison: Practical Poisoning Attacks Against the Rapid Response Framework %A David Huang %A Jaewon Chang %A Avidan Shah %A Prateek Mittal %A Chawin Sitawarin %B Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning %C Proceedings of Machine Learning Research %D 2026 %E Tong Zhang %E Miroslav Dudik %E Martin Jaggi %E Alekh Agarwal %E Sharon Li %E Dale Schuurmans %E Jerry Zhu %E Felix Berkenkamp %E Hanze Dong %E Alberto Bietti %F pmlr-v306-huang26e %I PMLR %P 46457--46487 %U https://proceedings.mlr.press/v306/huang26e.html %V 306 %X The Rapid Response (RR) framework (Peng et al., 2024), deployed in production systems including Anthropic’s ASL-3 safeguards (Anthropic, 2025), dynamically adapts jailbreak detection classifiers by generating synthetic training data from emerging attacks. We reveal that prompt injection can infiltrate this pipeline to deliver poisoned samples into the classifier’s training set, enabling two attack objectives: (I) targeted poisoning attacks that create false positives on harmless samples by categorizing them as a jailbreak, with a specific desired feature (e.g., certain formatting, subject, or keyword), (II) concept-based backdoor attacks that induce false negatives on jailbreak inputs, generalizing even to jailbreaks from attack strategies the defender explicitly trained against, when the backdoor trigger is present. Importantly, our threat model restricts adversaries to modify- ing only jailbreak samples (not benign data or labels), a constraint unexplored by prior work that makes the second objective particularly challeng- ing. We address this with Omission Attack, which exploits a new phenomenon: when training on concept-absent unsafe samples, the classifier mis- associates that concept’s presence with the safe label. Both attacks flip nearly all target labels with only 1% poisoning rate. Code: https://github.com/DH-davidhuang/rapid-poison
APA
Huang, D., Chang, J., Shah, A., Mittal, P. & Sitawarin, C.. (2026). Rapid Poison: Practical Poisoning Attacks Against the Rapid Response Framework. Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 306:46457-46487 Available from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v306/huang26e.html.

Related Material