Multi-Dimensional Model Integrity and Responsibility Assessment Index and Scoring Framework

Phuc Truong Loc Nguyen, Thanh Hung Do, Truong Thanh Hung Nguyen, Hung Cao
Proceedings of the The 39th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, PMLR 318:1175-1180, 2026.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence in high-stakes tabular domains cannot be evaluated by predictive performance alone, yet current practice still assesses explainability, fairness, robustness, privacy, and sustainability mostly in isolation. We propose the Model Integrity and Responsibility Assessment Index (MIRAI), a unified evaluation framework that measures tabular models across these five dimensions under a controlled comparison setting and aggregates them into a single score. MIRAI combines established metrics through normalized and direction-aligned dimension scores, which enables direct comparison across models with different architectural and computational profiles. Experiments on healthcare, financial, and socioeconomic datasets show that higher predictive performance does not necessarily imply better overall integrity and responsibility. In several cases, simpler models achieve a stronger cross-dimensional balance than more complex deep tabular architectures. MIRAI provides a compact and practical basis for responsible model selection in regulated settings.

Cite this Paper


BibTeX
@InProceedings{pmlr-v318-nguyen26b, title = {Multi-Dimensional Model Integrity and Responsibility Assessment Index and Scoring Framework}, author = {Nguyen, Phuc Truong Loc and Do, Thanh Hung and Nguyen, Truong Thanh Hung and Cao, Hung}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the The 39th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence}, pages = {1175--1180}, year = {2026}, editor = {Bouzar-Benlabiod, Lydia and Leung, Carson}, volume = {318}, series = {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, month = {25--29 May}, publisher = {PMLR}, pdf = {https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mlresearch/v318/main/assets/nguyen26b/nguyen26b.pdf}, url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v318/nguyen26b.html}, abstract = {Artificial intelligence in high-stakes tabular domains cannot be evaluated by predictive performance alone, yet current practice still assesses explainability, fairness, robustness, privacy, and sustainability mostly in isolation. We propose the Model Integrity and Responsibility Assessment Index (MIRAI), a unified evaluation framework that measures tabular models across these five dimensions under a controlled comparison setting and aggregates them into a single score. MIRAI combines established metrics through normalized and direction-aligned dimension scores, which enables direct comparison across models with different architectural and computational profiles. Experiments on healthcare, financial, and socioeconomic datasets show that higher predictive performance does not necessarily imply better overall integrity and responsibility. In several cases, simpler models achieve a stronger cross-dimensional balance than more complex deep tabular architectures. MIRAI provides a compact and practical basis for responsible model selection in regulated settings.} }
Endnote
%0 Conference Paper %T Multi-Dimensional Model Integrity and Responsibility Assessment Index and Scoring Framework %A Phuc Truong Loc Nguyen %A Thanh Hung Do %A Truong Thanh Hung Nguyen %A Hung Cao %B Proceedings of the The 39th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence %C Proceedings of Machine Learning Research %D 2026 %E Lydia Bouzar-Benlabiod %E Carson Leung %F pmlr-v318-nguyen26b %I PMLR %P 1175--1180 %U https://proceedings.mlr.press/v318/nguyen26b.html %V 318 %X Artificial intelligence in high-stakes tabular domains cannot be evaluated by predictive performance alone, yet current practice still assesses explainability, fairness, robustness, privacy, and sustainability mostly in isolation. We propose the Model Integrity and Responsibility Assessment Index (MIRAI), a unified evaluation framework that measures tabular models across these five dimensions under a controlled comparison setting and aggregates them into a single score. MIRAI combines established metrics through normalized and direction-aligned dimension scores, which enables direct comparison across models with different architectural and computational profiles. Experiments on healthcare, financial, and socioeconomic datasets show that higher predictive performance does not necessarily imply better overall integrity and responsibility. In several cases, simpler models achieve a stronger cross-dimensional balance than more complex deep tabular architectures. MIRAI provides a compact and practical basis for responsible model selection in regulated settings.
APA
Nguyen, P.T.L., Do, T.H., Nguyen, T.T.H. & Cao, H.. (2026). Multi-Dimensional Model Integrity and Responsibility Assessment Index and Scoring Framework. Proceedings of the The 39th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 318:1175-1180 Available from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v318/nguyen26b.html.

Related Material