ALMo: Interactive Aim-Limit-Defined, Multi-Objective System for Personalized High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Treatment Planning and Visualization for Cervical Cancer

Edward Chen, Natalie Dullerud, Pang Wei Koh, Thomas Niedermayr, Elizabeth Kidd, Sanmi Koyejo, Carlos Guestrin
Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning, PMLR 333:92-113, 2026.

Abstract

In complex clinical decision-making, clinicians must often track a variety of competing metrics defined by “aim” (ideal) and “limit” (strict) thresholds. Sifting through these high-dimensional tradeoffs to infer the optimal patient-specific strategy is cognitively demanding and historically prone to variability. In this paper, we address this challenge within the context of High-Dose-Rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervical cancer, where planning requires strictly managing radiation hot spots while balancing tumor coverage against organ sparing. We present ALMo (Aim-Limit-defined Multi-Objective system), an interactive decision support system designed to infer and operationalize clinician intent. ALMo employs a novel optimization framework that minimizes manual input through automated parameter setup and enables flexible control over toxicity risks. Crucially, the system allows clinicians to navigate the Pareto surface of dosimetric tradeoffs by directly manipulating intuitive aim and limit values. In a retrospective evaluation of 25 clinical cases, ALMo generated treatment plans that consistently met or exceeded manual planning quality, with 65% of cases demonstrating dosimetric improvements. Furthermore, the system significantly enhanced efficiency, reducing average planning time to approximately 17 minutes, compared to the conventional 30–60 minutes. While validated in brachytherapy, ALMo demonstrates a generalized framework for streamlining interaction in multi-criteria clinical decision-making.

Cite this Paper


BibTeX
@InProceedings{pmlr-v333-chen26a, title = {ALMo: Interactive Aim-Limit-Defined, Multi-Objective System for Personalized High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Treatment Planning and Visualization for Cervical Cancer}, author = {Chen, Edward and Dullerud, Natalie and Koh, Pang Wei and Niedermayr, Thomas and Kidd, Elizabeth and Koyejo, Sanmi and Guestrin, Carlos}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning}, pages = {92--113}, year = {2026}, editor = {Healey, Elizabeth and Fries, Jason and Pollard, Tom and Tang, Shengpu and Zink, Anna and Hartvigsen, Tom and Agrawal, Monica and Finlayson, Sam and Glicksberg, Benjamin and Beaulieu-Jones, Brett and Wang, Kai and Fontalvo, Daseyra and Sarker, Tasmie and Chen, Irene and Alsentzer, Emily}, volume = {333}, series = {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, month = {29--30 Jun}, publisher = {PMLR}, pdf = {https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mlresearch/v333/main/assets/chen26a/chen26a.pdf}, url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v333/chen26a.html}, abstract = {In complex clinical decision-making, clinicians must often track a variety of competing metrics defined by “aim” (ideal) and “limit” (strict) thresholds. Sifting through these high-dimensional tradeoffs to infer the optimal patient-specific strategy is cognitively demanding and historically prone to variability. In this paper, we address this challenge within the context of High-Dose-Rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervical cancer, where planning requires strictly managing radiation hot spots while balancing tumor coverage against organ sparing. We present ALMo (Aim-Limit-defined Multi-Objective system), an interactive decision support system designed to infer and operationalize clinician intent. ALMo employs a novel optimization framework that minimizes manual input through automated parameter setup and enables flexible control over toxicity risks. Crucially, the system allows clinicians to navigate the Pareto surface of dosimetric tradeoffs by directly manipulating intuitive aim and limit values. In a retrospective evaluation of 25 clinical cases, ALMo generated treatment plans that consistently met or exceeded manual planning quality, with 65% of cases demonstrating dosimetric improvements. Furthermore, the system significantly enhanced efficiency, reducing average planning time to approximately 17 minutes, compared to the conventional 30–60 minutes. While validated in brachytherapy, ALMo demonstrates a generalized framework for streamlining interaction in multi-criteria clinical decision-making.} }
Endnote
%0 Conference Paper %T ALMo: Interactive Aim-Limit-Defined, Multi-Objective System for Personalized High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Treatment Planning and Visualization for Cervical Cancer %A Edward Chen %A Natalie Dullerud %A Pang Wei Koh %A Thomas Niedermayr %A Elizabeth Kidd %A Sanmi Koyejo %A Carlos Guestrin %B Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning %C Proceedings of Machine Learning Research %D 2026 %E Elizabeth Healey %E Jason Fries %E Tom Pollard %E Shengpu Tang %E Anna Zink %E Tom Hartvigsen %E Monica Agrawal %E Sam Finlayson %E Benjamin Glicksberg %E Brett Beaulieu-Jones %E Kai Wang %E Daseyra Fontalvo %E Tasmie Sarker %E Irene Chen %E Emily Alsentzer %F pmlr-v333-chen26a %I PMLR %P 92--113 %U https://proceedings.mlr.press/v333/chen26a.html %V 333 %X In complex clinical decision-making, clinicians must often track a variety of competing metrics defined by “aim” (ideal) and “limit” (strict) thresholds. Sifting through these high-dimensional tradeoffs to infer the optimal patient-specific strategy is cognitively demanding and historically prone to variability. In this paper, we address this challenge within the context of High-Dose-Rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervical cancer, where planning requires strictly managing radiation hot spots while balancing tumor coverage against organ sparing. We present ALMo (Aim-Limit-defined Multi-Objective system), an interactive decision support system designed to infer and operationalize clinician intent. ALMo employs a novel optimization framework that minimizes manual input through automated parameter setup and enables flexible control over toxicity risks. Crucially, the system allows clinicians to navigate the Pareto surface of dosimetric tradeoffs by directly manipulating intuitive aim and limit values. In a retrospective evaluation of 25 clinical cases, ALMo generated treatment plans that consistently met or exceeded manual planning quality, with 65% of cases demonstrating dosimetric improvements. Furthermore, the system significantly enhanced efficiency, reducing average planning time to approximately 17 minutes, compared to the conventional 30–60 minutes. While validated in brachytherapy, ALMo demonstrates a generalized framework for streamlining interaction in multi-criteria clinical decision-making.
APA
Chen, E., Dullerud, N., Koh, P.W., Niedermayr, T., Kidd, E., Koyejo, S. & Guestrin, C.. (2026). ALMo: Interactive Aim-Limit-Defined, Multi-Objective System for Personalized High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Treatment Planning and Visualization for Cervical Cancer. Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 333:92-113 Available from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v333/chen26a.html.

Related Material