Low-Degree Method Fails to Predict Robust Subspace Recovery

He Jia, Aravindan Vijayaraghavan
Proceedings of Thirty Ninth Conference on Learning Theory, PMLR 336:3751-3781, 2026.

Abstract

The low-degree polynomial framework has been highly successful in predicting computational versus statistical gaps for high-dimensional problems in average-case analysis and machine learning. This success has led to the low-degree conjecture, which posits that this method captures the power and limitations of efficient algorithms for a wide class of high-dimensional statistical problems. We identify a natural and basic hypothesis testing problem in $\mathbb{R}^n$ which is polynomial time solvable, but for which the low-degree polynomial method fails to predict its computational tractability even up to degree $k=n^{\Omega(1)}$. Moreover, the low-degree moments match exactly up to degree $k=O(\sqrt{\log n/\log\log n})$. Our problem is a special case of the well-studied robust subspace recovery problem. The lower bounds suggest that there is no polynomial time algorithm for this problem. In contrast, we give a simple and robust polynomial time algorithm that solves the problem (and noisy variants of it), leveraging anti-concentration properties of the distribution. Our results suggest that the low-degree method and low-degree moments fail to capture algorithms based on anti-concentration, challenging their universality as a predictor of computational barriers.

Cite this Paper


BibTeX
@InProceedings{pmlr-v336-jia26a, title = {Low-Degree Method Fails to Predict Robust Subspace Recovery}, author = {Jia, He and Vijayaraghavan, Aravindan}, booktitle = {Proceedings of Thirty Ninth Conference on Learning Theory}, pages = {3751--3781}, year = {2026}, editor = {Hanneke, Steve and Lattimore, Tor}, volume = {336}, series = {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, month = {29 Jun--03 Jul}, publisher = {PMLR}, pdf = {https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mlresearch/v336/main/assets/jia26a/jia26a.pdf}, url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v336/jia26a.html}, abstract = {The low-degree polynomial framework has been highly successful in predicting computational versus statistical gaps for high-dimensional problems in average-case analysis and machine learning. This success has led to the low-degree conjecture, which posits that this method captures the power and limitations of efficient algorithms for a wide class of high-dimensional statistical problems. We identify a natural and basic hypothesis testing problem in $\mathbb{R}^n$ which is polynomial time solvable, but for which the low-degree polynomial method fails to predict its computational tractability even up to degree $k=n^{\Omega(1)}$. Moreover, the low-degree moments match exactly up to degree $k=O(\sqrt{\log n/\log\log n})$. Our problem is a special case of the well-studied robust subspace recovery problem. The lower bounds suggest that there is no polynomial time algorithm for this problem. In contrast, we give a simple and robust polynomial time algorithm that solves the problem (and noisy variants of it), leveraging anti-concentration properties of the distribution. Our results suggest that the low-degree method and low-degree moments fail to capture algorithms based on anti-concentration, challenging their universality as a predictor of computational barriers.} }
Endnote
%0 Conference Paper %T Low-Degree Method Fails to Predict Robust Subspace Recovery %A He Jia %A Aravindan Vijayaraghavan %B Proceedings of Thirty Ninth Conference on Learning Theory %C Proceedings of Machine Learning Research %D 2026 %E Steve Hanneke %E Tor Lattimore %F pmlr-v336-jia26a %I PMLR %P 3751--3781 %U https://proceedings.mlr.press/v336/jia26a.html %V 336 %X The low-degree polynomial framework has been highly successful in predicting computational versus statistical gaps for high-dimensional problems in average-case analysis and machine learning. This success has led to the low-degree conjecture, which posits that this method captures the power and limitations of efficient algorithms for a wide class of high-dimensional statistical problems. We identify a natural and basic hypothesis testing problem in $\mathbb{R}^n$ which is polynomial time solvable, but for which the low-degree polynomial method fails to predict its computational tractability even up to degree $k=n^{\Omega(1)}$. Moreover, the low-degree moments match exactly up to degree $k=O(\sqrt{\log n/\log\log n})$. Our problem is a special case of the well-studied robust subspace recovery problem. The lower bounds suggest that there is no polynomial time algorithm for this problem. In contrast, we give a simple and robust polynomial time algorithm that solves the problem (and noisy variants of it), leveraging anti-concentration properties of the distribution. Our results suggest that the low-degree method and low-degree moments fail to capture algorithms based on anti-concentration, challenging their universality as a predictor of computational barriers.
APA
Jia, H. & Vijayaraghavan, A.. (2026). Low-Degree Method Fails to Predict Robust Subspace Recovery. Proceedings of Thirty Ninth Conference on Learning Theory, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 336:3751-3781 Available from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v336/jia26a.html.

Related Material