[edit]
Robust Predictive Uncertainty and Double Descent in Contaminated Bayesian Random Features
Proceedings of the 42nd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, PMLR 337:943-960, 2026.
Abstract
We propose a robust {Bayesian} formulation of random feature (RF) regression that accounts explicitly for prior and likelihood misspecification via {Huber}-style contamination sets. Starting from the classical equivalence between ridge-regularized RF training and {Bayesian} inference with {Gaussian} priors and likelihoods, we replace the single prior and likelihood with $\epsilon$- and $\eta$-contaminated credal sets, respectively, and perform inference using pessimistic generalized {Bayesian} updating. We derive explicit and tractable bounds for the resulting lower and upper posterior predictive densities. These bounds show that, when contamination is moderate, prior and likelihood ambiguity effectively acts as a direct contamination of the posterior predictive distribution, yielding uncertainty envelopes around the classical {Gaussian} predictive. We introduce an Imprecise Highest Density Region ({IHDR}) for robust predictive uncertainty quantification and show that it admits an efficient outer approximation via an adjusted {Gaussian} credible interval. We further obtain predictive variance bounds (under a mild truncation approximation for the upper bound) and prove that they preserve the leading-order proportional-growth asymptotics known for RF models. Together, these results establish a robustness theory for {Bayesian} random features: predictive uncertainty remains computationally tractable, inherits the classical double-descent phase structure, and is improved by explicit worst-case guarantees under bounded prior and likelihood misspecification.