[edit]
Improving the Convergence of Private Shuffled Gradient Methods with Public Data
Proceedings of the 42nd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, PMLR 337:2538-2594, 2026.
Abstract
We consider the problem of differentially private ({DP}) convex empirical risk minimization ({ERM}). While the standard {DP}-{SGD} algorithm is theoretically well-established, practical implementations often rely on shuffled gradient methods that traverse the training data sequentially rather than sampling with replacement in each iteration. Despite their widespread use, the theoretical privacy-accuracy trade-offs of private shuffled gradient methods ($\textit{{DP}-ShuffleG}$) remain poorly understood, leading to a gap between theory and practice. In this work, we leverage privacy amplification by iteration (PABI) and a novel application of {Stein}’s lemma to provide the first empirical excess risk bound of $\textit{{DP}-ShuffleG}$. Our result shows that data shuffling results in worse empirical excess risk for $\textit{{DP}-ShuffleG}$ compared to {DP}-{SGD}. To address this limitation, we propose $\textit{Interleaved-ShuffleG}$, a hybrid approach that integrates public data samples in private optimization. By alternating optimization steps that use private and public samples, $\textit{Interleaved-ShuffleG}$ effectively reduces empirical excess risk. Our analysis introduces a new optimization framework with surrogate objectives, varying levels of noise injection, and a dissimilarity metric, which can be of independent interest. Our experiments on diverse datasets and tasks demonstrate the superiority of $\textit{Interleaved-ShuffleG}$ over several baselines.