Falsifying Causal Graphs With Outlier Events

William Roy Orchard, Philipp Michael Faller, Dominik Janzing
Proceedings of the 42nd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, PMLR 337:5081-5110, 2026.

Abstract

True causal relationships are rarely known, and inferring causal graphs from data is hard. A fundamental challenge is how to assess whether a given causal graph is good in the absence of a ground truth. We propose falsifying candidate causal graphs based on whether they can explain the propagation of an outlier event. Our approach leverages a key principle: weak outliers rarely cause strong ones. While this principle has previously been used in root cause analysis to identify root causes without prior knowledge of the graph, we turn it on its head and use it to falsify candidate causal graphs whose implied outlier propagation is inconsistent with the data. To this end, we present the first statistical tests for the hypothesis that a candidate graph is the true causal graph, and show they have false positive control, power guarantees against incorrect causal graphs, and can operate with a single outlier sample.

Cite this Paper


BibTeX
@InProceedings{pmlr-v337-orchard26a, title = {Falsifying Causal Graphs With Outlier Events}, author = {Orchard, William Roy and Faller, Philipp Michael and Janzing, Dominik}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 42nd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence}, pages = {5081--5110}, year = {2026}, editor = {Perković, Emilija and Malinsky, Daniel}, volume = {337}, series = {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, month = {17--21 Aug}, publisher = {PMLR}, pdf = {https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mlresearch/v337/main/assets/orchard26a/orchard26a.pdf}, url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v337/orchard26a.html}, abstract = {True causal relationships are rarely known, and inferring causal graphs from data is hard. A fundamental challenge is how to assess whether a given causal graph is good in the absence of a ground truth. We propose falsifying candidate causal graphs based on whether they can explain the propagation of an outlier event. Our approach leverages a key principle: weak outliers rarely cause strong ones. While this principle has previously been used in root cause analysis to identify root causes without prior knowledge of the graph, we turn it on its head and use it to falsify candidate causal graphs whose implied outlier propagation is inconsistent with the data. To this end, we present the first statistical tests for the hypothesis that a candidate graph is the true causal graph, and show they have false positive control, power guarantees against incorrect causal graphs, and can operate with a single outlier sample.} }
Endnote
%0 Conference Paper %T Falsifying Causal Graphs With Outlier Events %A William Roy Orchard %A Philipp Michael Faller %A Dominik Janzing %B Proceedings of the 42nd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence %C Proceedings of Machine Learning Research %D 2026 %E Emilija Perković %E Daniel Malinsky %F pmlr-v337-orchard26a %I PMLR %P 5081--5110 %U https://proceedings.mlr.press/v337/orchard26a.html %V 337 %X True causal relationships are rarely known, and inferring causal graphs from data is hard. A fundamental challenge is how to assess whether a given causal graph is good in the absence of a ground truth. We propose falsifying candidate causal graphs based on whether they can explain the propagation of an outlier event. Our approach leverages a key principle: weak outliers rarely cause strong ones. While this principle has previously been used in root cause analysis to identify root causes without prior knowledge of the graph, we turn it on its head and use it to falsify candidate causal graphs whose implied outlier propagation is inconsistent with the data. To this end, we present the first statistical tests for the hypothesis that a candidate graph is the true causal graph, and show they have false positive control, power guarantees against incorrect causal graphs, and can operate with a single outlier sample.
APA
Orchard, W.R., Faller, P.M. & Janzing, D.. (2026). Falsifying Causal Graphs With Outlier Events. Proceedings of the 42nd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 337:5081-5110 Available from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v337/orchard26a.html.

Related Material