[edit]
More Sources, Better AI? When Context Helps and Harms AI-Assisted Discovery in Educational Data Archives
Proceedings of the Impactful and Responsible AI Systems for Education Workshop, PMLR 339:112-122, 2026.
Abstract
Can AI support the research reasoning required to use unfamiliar educational datasets? We evaluated an AI-assisted discovery tool across two educational archives, ASSISTments and SEDA, using 50-item expert-designed assessments. We varied the sources available to the tool: dataset documentation, published papers, synthetic data samples, and their combination. Full triangulation across all three sources outperformed documentation alone in overall accuracy: 89% versus 67% on ASSISTments and 90% versus 73% on SEDA. However, more context was not always better. With codebook-oriented documentation, adding synthetic data without papers reduced appropriate-use accuracy from 80% to 40%, while adding papers without data reduced code-generation accuracy from 90% to 75%. Effective AI-assisted research support requires matching the information sources to how well a dataset’s design fits the research questions.