[edit]
LOCO-FL: Scaling and Reference Choice for Bayesian Structural Analysis of Between-Center Heterogeneity in Federated Learning with Markov Boundaries
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Probabilistic Graphical Models, PMLR 343:646-662, 2026.
Abstract
Multicenter quality-improvement programs still struggle to explain between-center heterogeneity using outcome measures alone. We investigate a Bayesian network method that focuses on Markov boundaries to characterize this heterogeneity at the structural level of risk models with multiple outcomes. Working with the full structure posterior rather than a point estimate allows the study of a phenomenon that point-identification learners overlook: under proper regularization, the resolvable Markov-boundary complexity grows with sample size. A naive comparison across centers, therefore, mixes sample-size induced model properties with genuine structural differences. We therefore study a global reference versus leave-one-center-out (LOCO) references together with sample-size correction, and show that both can be analyzed within a single reweighting of the per-family BD sufficient statistics, achieved exactly by adding the $\beta$-scaled LOCO counts as pseudocounts to the score. We investigate augmenting small centers to a larger, common effective size using the LOCO sample. We present two exact, privacy-preserving (PP) Bayesian federated learning schemes: a single global-reference scheme and a LOCO-reference scheme (LOCO-FL). We show that the LOCO-FL scheme supports per-center reference comparison and per-center scaling under the same institutional-privacy guarantees. Because the LOCO aggregate excludes a center’s own data, the same LOCO counts can also serve as an informative prior for that center’s local inference, without self-inclusion. We choose the scale of this prior empirically, as the value that most reduces the posterior spread, which reveals a trade-off between variance reduction and loss of the between-center signal. On synthetic data with known between-center differences, the method recovers these differences above the within-posterior spread. We report results for an eight-center Hungarian very preterm cohort (2{,}939 patients), measuring heterogeneity by posterior Jaccard distances between LOCO and global references. Results confirm the need to scale to a common effective sample size, the utility of a single global reference for coarse comparison, and that an empirically scaled LOCO prior reduces posterior spread.