Open Problem: Shifting Experts on Easy Data

Manfred K. Warmuth, Wouter M. Koolen
Proceedings of The 27th Conference on Learning Theory, PMLR 35:1295-1298, 2014.

Abstract

A number of online algorithms have been developed that have small additional loss (regret) compared to the best “shifting expert”. In this model, there is a set of experts and the comparator is the best partition of the trial sequence into a small number of segments, where the expert of smallest loss is chosen in each segment. The regret is typically defined for worst-case data / loss sequences. There has been a recent surge of interest in online algorithms that combine good worst-case guarantees with much improved performance on easy data. A practically relevant class of easy data is the case when the loss of each expert is iid and the best and second best experts have a gap between their mean loss. In the full information setting, the FlipFlop algorithm by De Rooij et al. (2014) combines the best of the iid optimal Follow-The-Leader (FL) and the worst-case-safe Hedge algorithms, whereas in the bandit information case SAO by Bubeck and Slivkins (2012) competes with the iid optimal UCB and the worst-case-safe EXP3. We ask the same question for the shifting expert problem. First, we ask what are the simple and efficient algorithms for the shifting experts problem when the loss sequence in each segment is iid with respect to a fixed but unknown distribution. Second, we ask how to efficiently unite the performance of such algorithms on easy data with worst-case robustness. A particular intriguing open problem is the case when the comparator shifts within a small subset of experts from a large set under the assumption that the losses in each segment are iid.

Cite this Paper

BibTeX
@InProceedings{pmlr-v35-warmuth14, title = {Open Problem: Shifting Experts on Easy Data}, author = {Warmuth, Manfred K. and Koolen, Wouter M.}, booktitle = {Proceedings of The 27th Conference on Learning Theory}, pages = {1295--1298}, year = {2014}, editor = {Balcan, Maria Florina and Feldman, Vitaly and Szepesvári, Csaba}, volume = {35}, series = {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, address = {Barcelona, Spain}, month = {13--15 Jun}, publisher = {PMLR}, pdf = {http://proceedings.mlr.press/v35/warmuth14.pdf}, url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v35/warmuth14.html}, abstract = {A number of online algorithms have been developed that have small additional loss (regret) compared to the best “shifting expert”. In this model, there is a set of experts and the comparator is the best partition of the trial sequence into a small number of segments, where the expert of smallest loss is chosen in each segment. The regret is typically defined for worst-case data / loss sequences. There has been a recent surge of interest in online algorithms that combine good worst-case guarantees with much improved performance on easy data. A practically relevant class of easy data is the case when the loss of each expert is iid and the best and second best experts have a gap between their mean loss. In the full information setting, the FlipFlop algorithm by De Rooij et al. (2014) combines the best of the iid optimal Follow-The-Leader (FL) and the worst-case-safe Hedge algorithms, whereas in the bandit information case SAO by Bubeck and Slivkins (2012) competes with the iid optimal UCB and the worst-case-safe EXP3. We ask the same question for the shifting expert problem. First, we ask what are the simple and efficient algorithms for the shifting experts problem when the loss sequence in each segment is iid with respect to a fixed but unknown distribution. Second, we ask how to efficiently unite the performance of such algorithms on easy data with worst-case robustness. A particular intriguing open problem is the case when the comparator shifts within a small subset of experts from a large set under the assumption that the losses in each segment are iid.} }
Endnote
%0 Conference Paper %T Open Problem: Shifting Experts on Easy Data %A Manfred K. Warmuth %A Wouter M. Koolen %B Proceedings of The 27th Conference on Learning Theory %C Proceedings of Machine Learning Research %D 2014 %E Maria Florina Balcan %E Vitaly Feldman %E Csaba Szepesvári %F pmlr-v35-warmuth14 %I PMLR %P 1295--1298 %U https://proceedings.mlr.press/v35/warmuth14.html %V 35 %X A number of online algorithms have been developed that have small additional loss (regret) compared to the best “shifting expert”. In this model, there is a set of experts and the comparator is the best partition of the trial sequence into a small number of segments, where the expert of smallest loss is chosen in each segment. The regret is typically defined for worst-case data / loss sequences. There has been a recent surge of interest in online algorithms that combine good worst-case guarantees with much improved performance on easy data. A practically relevant class of easy data is the case when the loss of each expert is iid and the best and second best experts have a gap between their mean loss. In the full information setting, the FlipFlop algorithm by De Rooij et al. (2014) combines the best of the iid optimal Follow-The-Leader (FL) and the worst-case-safe Hedge algorithms, whereas in the bandit information case SAO by Bubeck and Slivkins (2012) competes with the iid optimal UCB and the worst-case-safe EXP3. We ask the same question for the shifting expert problem. First, we ask what are the simple and efficient algorithms for the shifting experts problem when the loss sequence in each segment is iid with respect to a fixed but unknown distribution. Second, we ask how to efficiently unite the performance of such algorithms on easy data with worst-case robustness. A particular intriguing open problem is the case when the comparator shifts within a small subset of experts from a large set under the assumption that the losses in each segment are iid.
RIS
TY - CPAPER TI - Open Problem: Shifting Experts on Easy Data AU - Manfred K. Warmuth AU - Wouter M. Koolen BT - Proceedings of The 27th Conference on Learning Theory DA - 2014/05/29 ED - Maria Florina Balcan ED - Vitaly Feldman ED - Csaba Szepesvári ID - pmlr-v35-warmuth14 PB - PMLR DP - Proceedings of Machine Learning Research VL - 35 SP - 1295 EP - 1298 L1 - http://proceedings.mlr.press/v35/warmuth14.pdf UR - https://proceedings.mlr.press/v35/warmuth14.html AB - A number of online algorithms have been developed that have small additional loss (regret) compared to the best “shifting expert”. In this model, there is a set of experts and the comparator is the best partition of the trial sequence into a small number of segments, where the expert of smallest loss is chosen in each segment. The regret is typically defined for worst-case data / loss sequences. There has been a recent surge of interest in online algorithms that combine good worst-case guarantees with much improved performance on easy data. A practically relevant class of easy data is the case when the loss of each expert is iid and the best and second best experts have a gap between their mean loss. In the full information setting, the FlipFlop algorithm by De Rooij et al. (2014) combines the best of the iid optimal Follow-The-Leader (FL) and the worst-case-safe Hedge algorithms, whereas in the bandit information case SAO by Bubeck and Slivkins (2012) competes with the iid optimal UCB and the worst-case-safe EXP3. We ask the same question for the shifting expert problem. First, we ask what are the simple and efficient algorithms for the shifting experts problem when the loss sequence in each segment is iid with respect to a fixed but unknown distribution. Second, we ask how to efficiently unite the performance of such algorithms on easy data with worst-case robustness. A particular intriguing open problem is the case when the comparator shifts within a small subset of experts from a large set under the assumption that the losses in each segment are iid. ER -
APA
Warmuth, M.K. & Koolen, W.M.. (2014). Open Problem: Shifting Experts on Easy Data. Proceedings of The 27th Conference on Learning Theory, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 35:1295-1298 Available from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v35/warmuth14.html.

Related Material