Loosely consistent emphatic temporal-difference learning

Jiamin He, Fengdi Che, Yi Wan, A. Rupam Mahmood
Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, PMLR 216:849-859, 2023.

Abstract

There has been significant interest in searching for off-policy Temporal-Difference (TD) algorithms that find the same solution that would have been obtained in the on-policy regime. An important property of such algorithms is that their expected update has the same fixed point as that of On-policy TD($\lambda$), which we call loose consistency. Notably, Full-IS-TD($\lambda$) is the only existing loosely consistent method under general linear function approximation but, unfortunately, has a high variance and is scarcely practical. This notorious high variance issue motivates the introduction of ETD($\lambda$), which tames down the variance but has a biased fixed point. Inspired by these two methods, we propose a new loosely consistent algorithm called Average Emphatic TD (AETD($\lambda$)) with a transient bias, which strikes a balance between bias and variance. Further, we unify AETD($\lambda$) with existing methods and obtain a new family of loosely consistent algorithms called Loosely Consistent Emphatic TD (LC-ETD($\lambda$, $\beta$, $\nu$)), which can control a smooth bias-variance trade-off by varying the speed at which the transient bias fades. Through experiments on illustrative examples, we show the effectiveness and practicality of LC-ETD($\lambda$, $\beta$, $\nu$).

Cite this Paper

BibTeX
@InProceedings{pmlr-v216-he23a, title = {Loosely consistent emphatic temporal-difference learning}, author = {He, Jiamin and Che, Fengdi and Wan, Yi and Mahmood, A. Rupam}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence}, pages = {849--859}, year = {2023}, editor = {Evans, Robin J. and Shpitser, Ilya}, volume = {216}, series = {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, month = {31 Jul--04 Aug}, publisher = {PMLR}, pdf = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v216/he23a/he23a.pdf}, url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v216/he23a.html}, abstract = {There has been significant interest in searching for off-policy Temporal-Difference (TD) algorithms that find the same solution that would have been obtained in the on-policy regime. An important property of such algorithms is that their expected update has the same fixed point as that of On-policy TD($\lambda$), which we call loose consistency. Notably, Full-IS-TD($\lambda$) is the only existing loosely consistent method under general linear function approximation but, unfortunately, has a high variance and is scarcely practical. This notorious high variance issue motivates the introduction of ETD($\lambda$), which tames down the variance but has a biased fixed point. Inspired by these two methods, we propose a new loosely consistent algorithm called Average Emphatic TD (AETD($\lambda$)) with a transient bias, which strikes a balance between bias and variance. Further, we unify AETD($\lambda$) with existing methods and obtain a new family of loosely consistent algorithms called Loosely Consistent Emphatic TD (LC-ETD($\lambda$, $\beta$, $\nu$)), which can control a smooth bias-variance trade-off by varying the speed at which the transient bias fades. Through experiments on illustrative examples, we show the effectiveness and practicality of LC-ETD($\lambda$, $\beta$, $\nu$).} }
Endnote
%0 Conference Paper %T Loosely consistent emphatic temporal-difference learning %A Jiamin He %A Fengdi Che %A Yi Wan %A A. Rupam Mahmood %B Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence %C Proceedings of Machine Learning Research %D 2023 %E Robin J. Evans %E Ilya Shpitser %F pmlr-v216-he23a %I PMLR %P 849--859 %U https://proceedings.mlr.press/v216/he23a.html %V 216 %X There has been significant interest in searching for off-policy Temporal-Difference (TD) algorithms that find the same solution that would have been obtained in the on-policy regime. An important property of such algorithms is that their expected update has the same fixed point as that of On-policy TD($\lambda$), which we call loose consistency. Notably, Full-IS-TD($\lambda$) is the only existing loosely consistent method under general linear function approximation but, unfortunately, has a high variance and is scarcely practical. This notorious high variance issue motivates the introduction of ETD($\lambda$), which tames down the variance but has a biased fixed point. Inspired by these two methods, we propose a new loosely consistent algorithm called Average Emphatic TD (AETD($\lambda$)) with a transient bias, which strikes a balance between bias and variance. Further, we unify AETD($\lambda$) with existing methods and obtain a new family of loosely consistent algorithms called Loosely Consistent Emphatic TD (LC-ETD($\lambda$, $\beta$, $\nu$)), which can control a smooth bias-variance trade-off by varying the speed at which the transient bias fades. Through experiments on illustrative examples, we show the effectiveness and practicality of LC-ETD($\lambda$, $\beta$, $\nu$).
APA
He, J., Che, F., Wan, Y. & Mahmood, A.R.. (2023). Loosely consistent emphatic temporal-difference learning. Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 216:849-859 Available from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v216/he23a.html.

Related Material